E-MailSucheenglishdeutschTwitterYouTubeFacebook

Logo

 

Industrial espionage and spying on competitors (WISPIKON)

 

On June 26 and 27, 2025, some 20 experts from the fields of law and business and from security authorities discussed the topic of “Industrial espionage and spying on competitors” at the Daimler and Benz Foundation. They addressed the extent to which actual and legal deficiencies exist when it comes to protecting German companies from attempted espionage on the part of state and non-state actors from abroad. One aim in particular was to clarify whether this vulnerability could be eliminated by means of a national economic protection strategy.

In twelve keynote speeches, the participants reported on increasing threats and challenges in connection with industrial espionage. Against this backdrop, discussions focused on the perspectives of company representatives, trade associations, intelligence services, law enforcement and police authorities, and business consultants. These were contrasted with legal and criminological findings in relation to regulatory deficiencies in police and intelligence law, and in criminal and criminal procedural law. Specific problems were identified and initial proposals for solutions and improvements were put forward.

The discussions soon revealed a complex threat situation, the causes of which have not been researched to any great extent, at least from an overarching scientific perspective. Since the companies affected risk loss of reputation and control, it can be assumed in almost every respect that very many cases remain unreported, making it almost impossible to reliably quantify the extent of economic damage. Numerous overlapping responsibilities on the part of the authorities, a lack of clearly defined contact persons in the event of a crisis, insufficient definition of uniform security standards, along with legal frameworks that are not specifically tailored to industrial espionage and spying on competitors, give too much leeway to criminal perpetrators both within Germany and abroad.

One contributing factor is the lack of a joint competence center endowed with clear and powerful competencies, involving the participation of all stakeholders. The lack of a uniform overall concept for the protection of industry in Germany therefore leads to considerable security deficits due to insufficiently clear coordination and cooperation. Although relevant formats are in place for discussion with the security authorities and a basic willingness to cooperate is evident, industry has all too often been left to its own devices.

To eliminate these deficits, after a brief overview of the likewise deficient empirical study situation was presented, the second day of the event focused on developing specific proposals for solutions. Following intensive discussion, representatives from industry, the authorities, and science put forward concrete suggestions for improvement and then presented these in the plenary session. On the basis of these findings, the conference leaders compiled a catalog of “Ladenburg Theses on the Protection of Industry”, which is currently being finalized together with all participants. This catalog of theses is also intended to serve as a basis for further research as part of a larger research project on industrial protection. All participants in this Ladenburg Roundtable have already signaled their willingness to participate in the project.

Scientific management
  • Prof. Dr. Jan-Hendrik Dietrich, Department of Intelligence Services, Federal University of Applied Administrative Sciences, Berlin
  • Prof. Dr. Mark A. Zöller, Institute for Digitalization and the Law of Homeland Security, LMU Munich